Try feeding your GTM server-side container export to Claude or ChatGPT. You will get back a confused analysis of nested JSON, encoded strings, and references to custom APIs the AI does not understand. The export file that Google says you can “modify with a text editor” is effectively a black box—designed for GTM-to-GTM transfer, not human or AI comprehension.
The Promise vs. The Reality of GTM Exports
Google Tag Manager Help documentation paints an optimistic picture: “Exported containers can be compared, modified, shared, stored in a version control system, and imported back into Tag Manager.” The documentation even suggests you can “set up a new site with identical structure by using a text editor to modify items that need to change.”
That sounds reasonable. Export your container, open it in VS Code, change a few tracking IDs, import to the new site. Simple.
Except here is what a GTM server-side container export actually looks like:
Tags reference variables by internal IDs. Variables reference other variables. Triggers use encoded conditions. And the actual template code—the JavaScript that does the work—is sandboxed, using custom APIs like getEventData(), sendHttpRequest(), and getCookieValues() that exist only within GTM execution environment.
You may be interested in: Stape Requires GTM Knowledge I Do Not Have
What Makes GTM Exports AI-Hostile
When you feed code to an AI assistant, it needs context. Standard JavaScript? AI understands the DOM, browser APIs, common patterns. Standard PHP? AI knows WordPress hooks, database functions, common libraries.
GTM template code is neither. It runs in a sandboxed environment with proprietary APIs. The AI sees function calls but does not know what they do. It sees data structures but cannot trace the logic. Server-side GTM templates include sandboxed JavaScript that requires special GTM API knowledge to interpret.
The problems compound:
- Encoded template code: Custom JavaScript locked inside the JSON structure
- Internal reference IDs: Tags point to triggers and variables by opaque identifiers
- GTM-specific APIs: Functions that exist nowhere else in JavaScript
- Nested dependencies: Understanding one component requires understanding dozens of others
Even if you wanted to use AI to audit your GTM setup—check for redundant tags, identify tracking gaps, suggest optimizations—the format actively resists analysis.
The WordPress Alternative: Code You Can Actually Read
WordPress plugins export as readable PHP files that AI tools can analyze and modify directly. No encoding. No proprietary APIs. No sandboxed execution environments.
Open a WordPress tracking plugin code in VS Code. Feed it to Claude. Ask it to explain the tracking logic, find potential issues, or suggest improvements. The AI can trace the execution flow, understand the WordPress hooks, and provide actionable insights.
Here is the contrast:
- GTM export: JSON blob with encoded templates, internal references, proprietary APIs
- WordPress plugin: Standard PHP following documented WordPress patterns
One of these you can maintain with AI assistance. One of these you maintain by clicking through web interfaces.
You may be interested in: Universal IDs, UID2, and Hashed Emails: The Cookie Alternatives Big Ad Tech Uses
Why This Matters in the AI Era
AI coding assistants are transforming how developers maintain and debug code. Claude can review your codebase, identify issues, suggest fixes, even implement changes. Cursor and GitHub Copilot accelerate development significantly.
But these tools need readable code to work with.
43.5% of websites run WordPress (W3Techs, 2024). Those sites have tracking needs. The question is whether they implement tracking in a format that AI can help maintain, or a format that locks them into manual web interface workflows.
GTM was revolutionary in 2012. It abstracted tracking configuration from code. But that abstraction came with a cost: your tracking logic now lives in a proprietary format that resists outside tooling.
The Practical Impact
Consider what happens when you need to:
- Audit your tracking: In GTM, you click through each tag manually. In WordPress, you ask AI to review the plugin code.
- Debug a problem: In GTM, you use Preview Mode and browser dev tools. In WordPress, you read error logs and trace PHP execution—tasks AI excels at.
- Migrate tracking IDs: GTM documentation suggests text editor modifications, but the encoded format makes this error-prone. WordPress config changes are straightforward find-and-replace.
- Document your setup: GTM exports do not self-document. WordPress code can include comments and follows readable patterns AI can summarize.
GTM export files must be manually edited for bulk changes like changing tracking IDs—but “manual editing” of encoded JSON with internal references is a recipe for broken containers.
WordPress-Native Tracking: Built for Modern Workflows
Transmute Engine™ takes the opposite approach to GTM. Instead of abstracting tracking into a proprietary web interface with opaque exports, it keeps tracking logic in WordPress where it belongs—in readable, maintainable, AI-analyzable code.
Your tracking configuration lives in your WordPress database. Your event capture logic runs through standard PHP hooks. When something breaks, you debug it with the same tools you use for everything else in WordPress.
No sandboxed JavaScript. No encoded templates. No proprietary APIs that only one platform understands.
Key Takeaways
- GTM container exports are JSON files with encoded templates designed for GTM-to-GTM transfer, not human or AI analysis
- Server-side GTM templates use sandboxed JavaScript with proprietary APIs that general-purpose AI tools cannot interpret
- WordPress tracking plugins export as readable PHP that AI coding assistants can analyze, debug, and improve
- Google suggestion to “modify with a text editor” ignores the practical complexity of the export format
- In the AI era, maintainable code is readable code—GTM exports are neither
You can try, but the results will be limited. GTM exports contain encoded template code and sandboxed JavaScript with custom APIs that general-purpose AI tools are not trained to interpret. You will get surface-level observations about the JSON structure but not meaningful insights about your tracking logic.
GTM exports are designed for container-to-container transfer, not human editing. The format prioritizes completeness and accuracy for import/export operations rather than readability. Google own documentation suggests using text editors for modification, but the encoded templates make this impractical for most users.
WordPress-native tracking solutions export as standard PHP files that any AI coding assistant can read, analyze, and help you modify. The code follows standard programming patterns rather than proprietary sandboxed formats.
Keep your tracking code where you can read it—and where AI can help you maintain it. Learn how Transmute Engine eliminates GTM complexity.



